Log in

No account? Create an account

> Recent Entries
> Archive
> Friends
> Profile
> Chronarchy.com

Ár nDraíocht Féin
Three Cranes
Chaos Matrix

July 9th, 2004

Previous Entry Share Flag Next Entry
02:06 pm - Have you bitched out your Senator today? I have.

Okay, folks.

There's a lot of worry about this Gay Marriage ammendment floating around LJ right now. Apparently, the Senate is going to be discussing it and putting it to a vote shortly.

Why can I not find any information on this discussion? A Constitutional amendment is kinda big, and should be on the
schedule, I would think. Wouldn't you?

Of course, I may have missed it.

Anyway, this (unlike that "Draft everyone and their mother" thing that gets LJ in a tizzy every so often) has the potential to go to a vote, whether it will or will not pass.

Our job, as voters, is to ensure that our elected representatives understand our position. That is the most we can do, but it is also vitally important.

Write your senators (Ohio people, I have included your Sentators' contact info at the bottom of this post) and tell them what you feel. Even if you're for this amendment, you should still call them and tell them what you feel.

Remember, if this amendment passes, it will be the only amendment that restricts the freedom of an individual in our Constitution.

Federal Marriage Amendment
Bill # S.J.RES.30

Original Sponsor:
Wayne Allard (R-CO)

Cosponsor Total: 17
(last sponsor added 06/16/2004)
1 Democrats
16 Republicans

About This Legislation:
Constitutional Amendment - Declares that marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Prohibits the Constitution or any state constitution, or state or federal law from being construed to require that marital status or its legal incidents be conferred upon unmarried couples or groups.

See wording:

`Marriage in the United States shall consist only of the union of a man and a woman. Neither this Constitution, nor the constitution of any State, shall be construed to require that marriage or the legal incidents thereof be conferred upon any union other than the union of a man and a woman.'.

Cosponsors on this bill (alphabetical):

Sen Brownback, Sam [KS] - 3/22/2004
Sen Cochran, Thad [MS] - 5/3/2004
Sen Enzi, Michael B. [WY] - 3/22/2004
Sen Fitzgerald, Peter [IL] - 3/24/2004
Sen Frist, Bill [TN] - 4/8/2004
Sen Hatch, Orrin G. [UT] - 4/7/2004
Sen Hutchison, Kay Bailey [TX] - 6/16/2004
Sen Inhofe, Jim [OK] - 3/22/2004
Sen Kyl, Jon [AZ] - 6/14/2004
Sen Lott, Trent [MS] - 3/22/2004
Sen McConnell, Mitch [KY] - 4/8/2004
Sen Miller, Zell [GA] - 3/22/2004
Sen Santorum, Rick [PA] - 3/22/2004
Sen Sessions, Jeff [AL] - 3/22/2004
Sen Shelby, Richard C. [AL] - 3/22/2004
Sen Talent, Jim [MO] - 4/8/2004

On an amusing side-note, Senator Wayne Allard (R-CO) (Sponsor of this bill) was a Veterinarian before becoming a Senator.

Senator Mike DeWine (R-OH)
140 Russell Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-3503

Senator George Voinovich (R-OH)
317 Hart Senate Office Building
Washington, D.C. 20510-3504

If you are not from OH, you can find your Senator's names/addresses here. (Don't be concerned by the "slant" that the Human Rights Campaign might have; they use exactly the same engine as the American Family Association. If you don't believe me, compare the two engines.) :)
Current Mood: disappointeddisappointed
Current Music: "Something so Feminine About a Mandolin", -JB

(22 comments Leave a comment)


(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]
Date:July 12th, 2004 05:12 am (UTC)
The 18th amendment restricted individual rights

Yes, yes it does :) As it is no longer a constitutional amendment, though, I feel that I have the right to ignore it when making my point.

But I fully believe that if this amendment passes, we will see another amendment no more than ten years from now repealing it.

And that's just stupid, as you rightly point out.
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]
Date:July 13th, 2004 02:17 pm (UTC)
It remains an amendment, it's just that its enforcement is forbidden by the 21st.

Upon re-reading, you're right. I'd always thought it was "repealed".

After this, I don't trust another 4 years with Bush even if he reverses his position for the election.
(Deleted comment)
[User Picture]
Date:July 14th, 2004 05:09 am (UTC)
I agree. I suppose I should say this: "The only thing that could get me to vote Bush right now is a change in his position on the Family Marriage Amendment."

So I highly doubt I will vote for Bush.

> Go to Top