Log in

No account? Create an account

> Recent Entries
> Archive
> Friends
> Profile
> Chronarchy.com

Ár nDraíocht Féin
Three Cranes
Chaos Matrix

August 12th, 2004

Previous Entry Share Flag Next Entry
09:20 am - Epiphany. . .
I think we made a mistake allowing Triumph of the Moon onto the Dedicant reading list, but I'm not completely certain yet.

I suspect that once I finish it, my recommendation is going to be to remove it as soon as we find something better.

I'm so not using the word "moon" in the title of any book I write on Paganism.
Current Mood: thoughtfulthoughtful

(23 comments Leave a comment)


[User Picture]
Date:August 12th, 2004 06:31 am (UTC)
Really? I thought it was a great overview of the Pagan revival, though admittedly from a more British perspective. I've actually been using it for my Grail book. What do you think makes it wrong for the Dedican't list?
[User Picture]
Date:August 12th, 2004 06:45 am (UTC)
After reading the first two paragraphs of the introduction, I felt we'd done a serious disservice to our Dedicants. In there he says, basically, that Triumph is specifically about British Witchcraft, and that it generally ignores the rest of the Neo-Pagan movement. It also completely ignores America, "and only considers other nations or regions where they have made a significant subsequent impact upon its further development in that homeland."

The point of the books in that section is to give a broad description of Neo-Paganism, where it came from, where it's going, who the major players are/were, and hopefully to mention Neo-Pagan Druidism. This book, in the first two paragraphs, has stated that the scope of the book does not include the things we wished a book in that category to include.

I think it's going to be far too limited to have the same benefit a book like DDM has.
[User Picture]
Date:August 12th, 2004 10:48 am (UTC)
Hm. I hadn't thought about it that way, but you're right.
[User Picture]
Date:August 12th, 2004 11:45 am (UTC)
Actually, Hutton doesn't completely ignore America. Rather, he is only concerned with those aspects of American Witchcraft that have found their way back to England to influence the progress of British Witchcraft (e.g., the role played by the American feminist and environmental movements).
[User Picture]
Date:August 12th, 2004 11:50 am (UTC)
Interesting. This is why I want to read the entire book before I finally make a case for or against it to romandruid. I don't want to make the same mistake twice and make assumptions off the introduction :)

His mention of Geertz has me a bit concerned, though. I expect that this study is going to be very Geertzian.

> Go to Top