?

Log in

No account? Create an account
Chronarchy

> Recent Entries
> Archive
> Friends
> Profile
> Chronarchy.com

Links
Ár nDraíocht Féin
Three Cranes
MySpace
Chaos Matrix
OSU PSA

October 3rd, 2005


Previous Entry Share Next Entry
02:06 pm - Sex magic and amusement
I've been thinking recently about sex magic. I've never had the opportunity to experiment with it with other people before. . . now I do have that chance. I don't know exactly how to treat it, though, or even how to approach it. Maybe I should take out a personal ad?

"SWM seeks SF for sex magic and ritual. Must be clean, discreet, N/S with some magical experience. Willing to train enthusiastic student to necessary level. Relationship will be primarily magical rather than emotional. Ideal candidates should be between 22 and 28, professional in their demeanor, not be allergic to latex, and must not cry during orgasm. Blood/STD tests required."

Wouldn't that be creepy?
Current Mood: amusedamused
Current Music: "One Lonely Room", -JB

(106 comments Leave a comment)

Comments:


From:perlgirlju
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:08 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Eh, I've never submitted an ad either BUT from what I've gathered you would only need to put one in the listing if it was something that would automatically disqualify a potential candidate.
[User Picture]
From:chronarchy
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:12 pm (UTC)
(Link)
*nods*

The things you never knew you never knew about personal ads.

I have, however, wondered if I've offended some here and there with such a limited age range. Not intentional, of course.
From:perlgirlju
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:16 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I wouldn't worry overmuch. Your tastes, which includes the preferred age of your potential partner, are your own and you are answerable to none but yourself for them.
[User Picture]
From:chronarchy
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:21 pm (UTC)
(Link)
*nods*

Of course, due to recent events, I imagine I'm more likely to see offense where there is none.

Besides, tastes aren't really set in stone. I certainly wouldn't rule anything out because of age. . . Except, perhaps, milk.
From:perlgirlju
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:26 pm (UTC)
(Link)
*laugh* Yes, milk has that date stamped on it for a very good reason. People, not so much.

Regardless, best of luck in your search.
[User Picture]
From:chronarchy
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:31 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Well, it's not an official search. I wouldn't have to search, actually, if I were actively looking. I know exactly who to ask.

Though I admit that I would probably rather them ask me than me ask them.
From:perlgirlju
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:33 pm (UTC)
(Link)
*laugh* NOW I'm dying of curiousity.
[User Picture]
From:chronarchy
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:34 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Wouldn't have ever said anything if I didn't think it'd touch that off in you. :)
From:perlgirlju
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:38 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Tease!


Though, I kinda suspected you were looking for that kind of response. Doesn't change that now I'm mentally going over the list of women that I know you know and trying to figure out which one. I *think* I know who, but knowing how these things go, I'm probably wrong.
[User Picture]
From:chronarchy
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:39 pm (UTC)
(Link)
You may feel free to ask, of course. Not like I'm hiding it from my Scribe.

Hmm. . . I suppose you ought to ask before Samhain, then.
From:perlgirlju
Date:October 3rd, 2005 08:41 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Yeah, I probably should. I won't though. I may *want* to know, but I don't *need* to know.
[User Picture]
From:qorinda
Date:October 3rd, 2005 09:12 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Oh yes, I am SO offended that I am not in the age-range. ;)

(Can't help but laugh, given the fact that my current partner is about the same age as you! AND sex magic is definitely a part of it)
[User Picture]
From:duriyah
Date:October 4th, 2005 12:45 pm (UTC)
(Link)
Don't worry about offending. You are absolutely correct that you should stick with what is comfortable with you. It just made me remember my own days of searching personal ads. I would peruse the ads of the younger men that I fancied, and every single one it seemed listed a preferred age range of 18 to one year older than the age of the guy posting. It seemed that a host of very nice, decent, interesting men were well beyond my reach because I was too old. It was sad and frustrating. The personals world is harsh. Ultimately I realized I was too sensitive and gave it up.

I am sorry if I made you feel bad. You shouldn't.
[User Picture]
From:chronarchy
Date:October 4th, 2005 01:07 pm (UTC)
(Link)
See, I think that's why I thought I was supposed to put an age range in. *shrugs*

Were I to create an actual personal ad (and, what the hell, maybe I should), I wouldn't include an age range for the other, just mention my own age.

No, not you. Just the general response made me feel a bit bad. Especially since it was so randomly chosen.

Then again, I'm overly sensative right now to accidentally offending people due to certain recent events.
[User Picture]
From:duriyah
Date:October 4th, 2005 01:21 pm (UTC)
(Link)
I think on match.com you *were* required to list an age preference. You could list it as 18-80, though almost no one ever did.

Were I to create an actual personal ad (and, what the hell, maybe I should), I wouldn't include an age range for the other, just mention my own age.

That's very cool!

Well I'm not offended, so you don't have to worry :)

> Go to Top
LiveJournal.com