November 6th, 2003
|05:17 pm - Wow.|
This is, officially, one of the top sexiest things I have ever seen:
Sorry for those of you on dial-up. . .
Current Mood: enthralled
Current Music: "You'll Never Work in Dis Bidness Again", -JB
Is she having a seizure?
Her movement is so unnatural that is appears to be a caricature of a stoned hippie/head-banger. She does not appear very comfortable to me. Her movement combined with the constant need to push her hair back (a nervous habit that many women have) doesn't show comfort and hus lacks the sex appeal -- for me anyway.
I applaud the effort, but I think I'll stick to the more 'casual' women in On Our Backs. ;)
Hehe. I'm not sure we find the same things sexy :)
Of course, I haven't watched many women masturbate, so I have no real frame of reference as to what women do when they do. *thinks a moment* yeah, that sorta makes sense.
Now, if there were people who wanted to *show* me what a woman looks like when she masturbates, let me know. . .
Well, I can offer up this-- I have seen women masturbate (being a grrl, having dated women and having had sex with women), and it don't look like that! :D
I gotta say I'm with chronarchy
on this one. I am heterosexual and even I thought it was hot. The movement seemed pretty fluid to me (don't know if it has anything to do with modem speed). I do agree that it maybe isn't a realistic portrayal of a woman masturbating - it is obviously made to arouse the viewer more than to get the job done for the woman in the film . . . Only problem for me was I had no sound so I still don't know if I agree that the Trollops are great to masturbate to.
I'm on "high speed dsl", so I saw at as it was intended to be, with the natural limited of buffering and such. :)
I'm probably just being too picky due to my experience as being a dancer, figure artist & watching it happen enough. ;) From this I just think women really masturbating is much more sensual and fluid than how the model was moving. But, like I said, I'm probably just being too picky. :)
Hmm, that reminds me of something.
I went to the library sale today and there was a book from the 1930's on phallic cults. I thought about getting it but decided that as I had 5 dollars to spend and it cost 7 I really ought not.
As it is, I got 4 books for that 5 bucks. Go me.
wahh! I couldn't see it! Stupid dial-up!